the evolution of child pornography
Saturday, April 04, 2009 (11:08 AM)
i just happen to see a news article on a pre-pubescent girl performing pole-dancing in thailand. my guess would be that she's only 8 or 10 years old.
granted, there's no explicit sexual acts performed. but a sexually provocative dance, to me, should still be classified under child pornography. and whoever hired that girl should be charged for at least 2 counts.
1) child labour
2) paedophilia
worse if she was made to do it. and whoever uploaded those videos...
3) distribution of child pornography
i wonder if paedophiles molest themselves when they were young. maybe it's classified under masturbation.