i think i am
talk somemore




get out!

  • Ali
  • Alvin
  • Best Writes
  • Colin
  • Hannah
  • Piglet
  • Joleen
  • Mandy
  • Rume
  • Vincent


  • read somemore

    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    January 2009
    February 2009
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    June 2009
    July 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    November 2009
    March 2010

    the gay movement
    Saturday, July 05, 2008 (2:33 PM)

    not a happy one, definitely.

    in april this year, mediacorp was fined SGD$15,000 by the media development authority (MDA) for airing a home improvement show featuring a gay couple and their adopted baby. this was their second breach of the code. but this feature was not so much an issue since the reality TV series The Amazing Race had passed broadcast laws smoothly for a few seasons while featuring gay couples in these races. what ultimately sealed the fine was the congratulatory gesture by the host which presented gay couples as an acceptable family unit.

    in the free-to-air TV programme code, programmes that promote, justify or glamourise gay lifestyle are unacceptable. normalising gays is a big nono for the authorities. but i'd question this move.

    gay lifestyles are not matters of choice. they are matters of nature. not allowing gays to be part of the norm is unjustifiable. for one, featuring gays as an acceptable family unit does not and will not turn non-gays to gays. being gay is not a choice, i reiterate. if one is not gay, he will not be gay no matter how "normal" it is.

    while i do recognise the problem in glamourising such lifestyles - as the non-gays may try to be gay in order to be "cool" - but like how fads work, they are just what they are. when the children grow up, they would ultimately understand their sexual inclinations. portraying it as a norm and glamourising it, are 2 different matters.

    not accepting (as opposed to normalising) it, however, ostracizes the gays who happen to be gay - again - not by choice. it simply makes them feel suppressed, unable to live their right to a normal life. always under the scrutiny and judgments of the heterosexuals.

    this creates more problems as some may participate in heterosexual marriages in order to conform to the social understanding of a "normal" family unit. it destroys their own life and happiness. it destroys the lives and happiness of their spouse who only later come to realise that they married a gay. it destroys the lives of the children who will get mocked by their peers that their father is a gay.

    but when gay lifestyle becomes more acceptable, such problems cease. the gays do not marry women. families do not get broken up. the children do not get laughed at because such relationships are no longer "weird".

    i'm not promoting the normalising of gays. neither am i against it. i'm just wondering why it can't be accepted? let's just forbid public displays of affection. even heterosexual acts are frowned upon anyway.