i think i am
talk somemore




get out!

  • Ali
  • Alvin
  • Best Writes
  • Colin
  • Hannah
  • Piglet
  • Joleen
  • Mandy
  • Rume
  • Vincent


  • read somemore

    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    January 2009
    February 2009
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    June 2009
    July 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    November 2009
    March 2010

    quantum leap
    Sunday, May 25, 2008 (12:24 AM)

    i was watching eureka quite some time ago and like all other shows on scientific breakthroughs, quantum physics was the central mechanic working the show. at least that was what it seemed to me.

    somewhere at the end of the season, a living paradox occurs when one scientist went back in time to save his wife. thus, the revelation of 2 of his wife's existence created the paradox. a charred body and a living one. in order to fix this paradox, the male protagonist was sent back in time to prevent the scientist from saving his wife. from then, he lived a different life and never returned to where he came from. the show supposedly allowed that to go as a happy ending. but a problem occurs which wasn't dealt with. wouldn't that time have another paradox where 2 of the male protagonist exist?

    an even older show called quantum leap kinda explained the concept of quantum physics but when you talk of quantum leap, it seems to me that a paradox is bound to happen. but oddly, none of them deals with the same concept on the same basis. most do not talk of paradoxes, which was the main idea of "changing history". because if you "change history" and paradoxes occur, then wouldn't it be futile to even deal with quantum physics at all? eureka seemed to have attempted a really complex issue.

    one last question. are the physicists of today really that obsessed about quantum physics?